KMID : 1038120190520010030
|
|
Clinical Endoscopy 2019 Volume.52 No. 1 p.30 ~ p.35
|
|
Pitfalls in the Interpretation of Publications about Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection of Early Gastric Cancer with Undifferentiated-Type Histology
|
|
Bang Chang-Seok
Baik Gwang-Ho
|
|
Abstract
|
|
|
Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) is a standard treatment for patients with gastrointestinal neoplasms with a negligible risk of lymph node metastasis. ESD enables en bloc resection of gastrointestinal neoplasms and organ preservation, thereby, avoiding surgical treatment. Although small (<2 cm) intramucosal early gastric cancer with undifferentiated-type histology (EGC-UH) without ulceration is included in the expanded criteria for ESD, controversies remain due to different biology and characteristics compared to EGC with differentiated-type histology. The authors previously presented studies about the technical feasibility of ESD for these lesions using a meta-analysis and retrospective multicenter analysis. However, many pitfalls were identified in the interpretation of studies analyzing histologic discrepancy, mixed-type histology, criteria-based analysis of therapeutic outcomes, interpretation of curative resection, and long-term clinical outcomes. In this review, the authors discuss pitfalls in the interpretation of publications on ESD for EGC-UH.
|
|
KEYWORD
|
|
Carcinoma, Endoscopic submucosal dissection, Undifferentiated
|
|
FullTexts / Linksout information
|
|
|
|
Listed journal information
|
|
|